Authorized security testing

Security assessments for SaaS, API, Cloud, and AI products

We test the product you actually ship — application, API, cloud configuration, and AI components — and hand your engineers reproducible findings they can fix, then verify.

Every engagement begins with written authorization and an agreed scope. Read our Authorized Testing Policy.

How CyberCache assesses a product attack surface Four assessed layers — Application, API and Identity, Cloud Exposure, and AI Components — are reviewed as one connected surface, and all findings converge into a single evidence and report output that feeds remediation and retesting. WEB / CLIENT Application AUTHZ / SESSION API & Identity CONFIG / STORAGE Cloud Exposure LLM / RAG / TOOLS AI Components REPRODUCIBLE OUTPUT Evidence & Report REMEDIATION → RETEST
Where teams usually start

Three reasons product teams call us

An enterprise deal is waiting on a security review

A prospect has sent a security questionnaire, asked for a penetration test report, or made testing a condition of signature. You need defensible evidence, not a scan summary.

The product has grown faster than its security review

New tenants, new integrations, new permissions, and a first AI feature have all shipped since anyone looked at the whole surface deliberately.

You need to know what an attacker would actually reach

Not a list of theoretical weaknesses, but which paths are genuinely exploitable in your environment, what they expose, and what to fix first.

Services

Three ways to work with us

Each engagement is scoped to your product and environment. Pricing follows a scope review, because a fixed number set before anyone has seen the architecture is a guess.

One connected surface

We assess the product as an attacker meets it

Application, API, cloud, and AI weaknesses are rarely independent. A permissive cloud role turns a minor API flaw into a tenant breach, and an AI feature with broad tool access can turn a prompt into a privileged action. We test them together.

Web application

Authentication, session handling, business logic, and the multi-tenant boundaries that separate one customer from another.

API and access control

Authorization at the object and function level, token handling, rate controls, and the endpoints that never appear in the interface.

Cloud configuration

Identity and permission design, storage exposure, network reachability, and secret handling in the environment the product runs in.

AI components

Prompt and instruction handling, retrieval boundaries, tool and function access, and what an AI feature can be persuaded to do on a user’s behalf.

How an engagement runs

From scope review to verified fix

The same sequence every time, so you know what happens next and when your team is needed.

  1. 01

    Scope Review

    We review your assets, architecture, and objective to define what should be tested and why.

  2. 02

    Proposal

    A written proposal states the scope, approach, deliverables, and commercial terms.

  3. 03

    Rules of Engagement

    Authorization, in-scope and out-of-scope assets, dates, techniques, and emergency stop conditions are agreed in writing.

  4. 04

    Security Testing

    Manual, evidence-led testing within the approved scope, with communication throughout.

  5. 05

    Technical Report

    Findings with reproduction steps, evidence, business impact, and specific remediation guidance.

  6. 06

    Debrief

    A working session with your engineers to walk through findings and answer questions.

  7. 07

    Remediation

    Your team fixes issues; we stay available for clarification on any finding.

  8. 08

    Retest

    We verify the fixes and record the resulting status against each original finding.

Read the full methodology

How to judge us

Evidence, not adjectives

We are a small, focused team. Rather than ask you to take claims on trust, we publish the things you can actually inspect before you commit.

Inspect the output

A real sample report

See how a finding is written: reproduction steps, evidence, business impact, and remediation an engineer can act on. Clearly labelled as a fictional example.

Inspect the method

A documented methodology

What we test, how we test it, what we deliberately leave out, and how findings are rated. Written so your engineers can challenge it.

Inspect the boundaries

A written authorization model

Nothing is tested without written authorization and an agreed scope, with defined exclusions and stop conditions.

Success-based option

No Hack, No Pay

For teams that want the outcome to carry the risk: the testing fee becomes payable only if we demonstrate the security objective we agreed in writing beforehand.

It is an authorized, scoped engagement with defined success criteria, defined exclusions, and agreed rules of engagement — not unrestricted testing.

How the offer works

Authorization comes first

Testing begins only after written authorization from someone entitled to grant it, within an agreed scope and timeframe. Social engineering, physical intrusion, denial-of-service, and destructive techniques are excluded by default.

Start with a scope review

Tell us what you are building and what is driving the timeline. We will come back with a written scope, an approach, and what it would cost — not a sales call.